With the World Cup on a two-week hiatus we can now turn our attention to the second attraction for many an English-language nordic fan: US Nationals.
Of course, there's not much to see -- only one race in three days, and it's not looking good for tomorrow, either.
A lot of people paid a lot of money to head to Alaska, and it could end up all being for one race. They are, understandably, upset. A common sentiment I've heard in the tropics of Boston is "why the hell did they decide to hold Nationals in such a goddamn cold place??"
The answer might be complicated, but the simple part is that Anchorage isn't a goddamn cold place.
Here's the average January high for the last 3 Nationals Sites:
Rumford, ME: 27 F
Houghton, MI: 22 F
Anchorage, AK: 22 F
You'd be hard-pressed to look at those numbers and say "we should have known this would happen."
(I would not recommend having nationals in Fairbanks, with its average January high of 2 degrees, anytime soon.)
And, if you'd like to complain about a race site that requires some pricey air travel from probably 75% of the competitors -- we won't stop you.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
US Nationals Temperature Debacle
Posted by Colin R at 4:29 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
It just goes to show that pissing off the gods of the Upper Peninsula isn't a good idea. They liked having Nationals in the Copper Country, and they didn't like Sarah Palin.
I'll just say that I'm happy not to be in Anchorage.
You forgot about Park City, but it doesn't do anything to change your overall point.
Post a Comment